Laserfiche WebLink
defined the terms and noted that whether it be the Just Cause or Emergency Circumstances <br />exception, any Council Member may not attend remotely for more than 3 consecutive <br />months or 20 percent of the regular meetings within a calendar year. The maximum number <br />of meetings a Council Member may teleconference under AB 2449 is 4 meetings per calendar <br />year. <br />As public comment, Dennis Bell listed his frustrations with Zoom to include the public's <br />inability to consistently access meetings and the lack of toll -free phone numbers for the <br />public. Tracy Wise reminded the Council that zoom had provided a new tool to allow for <br />more public engagement and promote transparency. Zoom caller Stephanie added that she <br />regularly attended meetings via zoom as a way to participate and stay informed and she urged <br />the Council to continue offering this as an option for the public. <br />Council Members presented their opinions and perspectives on AB 2449 teleconferencing <br />guidelines. They touched on topics including the value of increasing public participation, the <br />provision of greater flexibility for Council Members when attending meetings and the <br />maximum number of meetings a Council Member may teleconference (limit of 4 per year). <br />Mayor Pro Tem Barich said he was not a fan of Zoom and instead, preferred in -person <br />meetings with the public speaking directly to the Council. Staff recommended the Planning <br />Commission follow City Council direction and that all other Commissions and Boards follow <br />traditional Brown Act teleconferencing rules. <br />On motion of Council Member Jenna Guzman -Lowery, seconded by Council Member Denise <br />Davis, the City Council unanimously approved, by roll call vote, to continue the use of Zoom <br />for all meetings of the City Council and the Planning Commission in order to comply with <br />teleconferencing requirements as described in California Assembly Bill 2449; and authorized <br />all other Commissions, Boards and Committees to follow traditional Brown Act <br />teleconferencing rules. <br />Vote: 5 - 0 Passed <br />Priority Projects Review <br />City Manager Duggan provided a brief review of staffs progress relating to three projects <br />already identified by the City Council. He explained the purpose of the workshop tonight was <br />to discuss and prioritize further projects and, if necessary, ask for additional direction and <br />clarification from the full Council. Prioritizing projects allows the City to focus finite staff <br />time on items the full City Council wishes to pursue and in which order. Mayor Tejeda <br />recommended that if any of these projects could be rolled into existing work already assigned <br />to staff, it would be ideal. Thirty-one projects were listed as "Not Prioritized" and the City <br />Manager briefly reviewed each one, while Council Members added comments and offered <br />suggestions. The list was revaluated and modified in real time as a result of Council input. It <br />was also noted the list was a living, dynamic document which could be altered. Mayor Pro <br />Tem Barich asked to add the following projects: Texonia Park improvements to accommodate <br />the 2023 fall season of Jr. All American Football League; Possible conversion of Clement <br />Middle School tennis courts to pickle ball courts; and Dog Park lighting installation. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further action the special meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M. <br />Special CC —February 13, 2023 <br />Page 2 <br />